A common complaint does not always mean a common diagnosis

Published: 29 July 2024
Abstract Views: 265
PDF: 116
Video 1: 86
Video 2: 60
Video 3: 86
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

An 83-year-old woman was referred to our Emergency Department (ED) for a chronic pericardial effusion with exertional dyspnoea that had been worse over the past several days. She denied any chest pain, syncope, fever, or leg swelling. She suffered from hypertension, heart failure NYHA I, diabetes mellitus type 2, and essential tremor treated with carvedilol, furosemide, olmesartan-hydrochlorothiazide, acetylsalicylic acid, and dapagliflozin. Her physical examination revealed no abnormalities. Her vital signs were blood pressure 130/70 mmHg, heart rate 70 bpm, peripheral oxygen saturation 95% in room ambient, and respiratory rate 18/min. Laboratory findings, including C-reactive protein and troponin T, were in the normal range. The electrocardiogram showed a sinus rhythm with normal atrioventricular conduction and ventricular repolarization. Point-of-care ultrasound documented an A-line pattern without pleural effusion and a diffuse and large (30 mm fluid strip) pericardial effusion without signs of cardiac tamponade and unchanged from the previous echocardiogram (Video 1). It also showed a large pulsing mass 6x6 cm close to the right atrium with a predominant systolic flow (Video 2, Video 3).

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Dodge-Khatami A, Mavroudis C, Backer CL. Congenital Heart Surgery Nomenclature and Database Project: anomalies of the coronary arteries. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:S270-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(99)01248-5
Liu J, Konda S. Operative approach for right coronary artery to coronary sinus fistula. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2020;33:276-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2020.1727717
Stefanescu Schmidt AC, Redwood T, Alonso-Gonzalez R, et al. An unusual pair: coronary artery fistula and coronary sinus ostium stenosis as a cause of refractory angina. Eur Heart J Case Rep 2022;6:ytac121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/ytac121
Ozeki S, Utsunomiya T, Kishi T, et al. Coronary arteriovenous fistula presenting as chronic pericardial effusion. Circ J 2002;66:779-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.66.779
Habermann JH, Howard ML, Johnson ES. Rupture of the coronary sinus with hemopericardium. A rare complication of coronary arteriovenous fistula. Circulation 1963;28:1143-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.28.6.1143
Baumgartner H, De Backer J, Babu-Narayan SV, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J 2021;42:563-645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4702
Blaivas M. Incidence of pericardial effusion in patients presenting to the emergency department with unexplained dyspnea. Acad Emerg Med 2001;8:1143-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01130.x

How to Cite

Cavaleri, F., Porta, L., & Poggiali, E. (2024). A common complaint does not always mean a common diagnosis. Emergency Care Journal, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/ecj.2024.12724