Sepsis and septic shock in geriatrics

Sepsis is a potentially life-threatening condition that poses diagnostic challenges, particularly in the older population. Clinical manifestations of sepsis in these individuals can be blurred and atypical, making detection and diagnosis difficult. Common symptoms such as fever may be absent; conversely, older patients may present with atypical signs such as delirium, altered mental status, falls, weakness, and urinary incontinence. This can lead to delayed diagnosis, which increases the risk of rapid progression to septic shock. To improve diagnostic accuracy, various laboratory biomarkers and clinical scores have been developed, such as the Sequential (Sepsis-related) Organ Failure Assessment Score (SOFA-score), quick SOFA (qSOFA), and geriatric-qSOFA. These tools aid in identifying sepsis and predicting mortality risk promptly. In terms of treatment, early intervention is crucial. Maintaining adequate tissue perfusion (“fluid resuscitation”), appropriate antibiotic therapy, and eventually vasopressor support are key components of sepsis management in older adults. Additionally, in frail and comorbid patients, priority must be given to supportive care aimed at enhancing quality of life. Tailored therapeutic interventions are crucial to improving outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:801-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287

Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 2020;395:200-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7

Remelli F, Fogagnolo A, Zurlo A, et al. Prognostic factors in older patients admitted in ICU with diagnosis of abdominal sepsis (sepsis-3 criteria). JGG 2020;68:152-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36150/2499-6564-391

Rowe T, Araujo KL, Van Ness PH, et al. Outcomes of older adults with sepsis at admission to an intensive care unit. Open Forum Infect Dis 2016;3:ofw010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofw010

Fleischmann C, Scherag A, Adhikari NK, et al. Assessment of global incidence and mortality of hospital-treated sepsis. Current estimates and limitations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016;193:259-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201504-0781OC

Nasa P, Juneja D, Singh O. Severe sepsis and septic shock in the elderly: an overview. World J Crit Care Med 2012;1:23-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v1.i1.23

Vincent JL, De Backer D. Circulatory Shock N Engl J Med 2013;369:1726-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1208943

Preau S, Vodovar D, Jung B et al. Energetic dysfunction in sepsis: a narrative review. Ann Intensive Care 2021;11:104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-021-00893-7

Chung HY, Wickel J, Brunkhorst FM, et al. Sepsis-associated encephalopathy: from delirium to dementia? J Clin Med 2020;9:703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030703

Czempik PF, Pluta MP, Krzych ŁJ. Sepsis-associated brain dysfunction: a review of current literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:5852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165852

Mazeraud A, Righy C, Bouchereau E, et al. Septic-associated encephalopathy: a comprehensive review. Neurotherapeutics 2020;17:392-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-020-00862-1

Carbone F, Liberale L, Preda A, et al. Septic cardiomyopathy: from pathophysiology to the clinical setting. Cells 2022;11:2833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11182833

Mankowski RT, Laitano O, Clanton TL, et al. Pathophysiology and treatment strategies of acute myopathy and muscle wasting after sepsis. J Clin Med 2021;10:1874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10091874

Iba T, Umemura Y, Wada H, et al. Roles of coagulation abnormalities and microthrombosis in sepsis: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Arch Med Res 2021;52:788-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2021.07.003

Soysal P, Stubbs B, Lucato P, et al. Inflammation and frailty in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev 2016;31:1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2016.08.006

Ramoni D, Tirandi A, Montecucco F, Liberale L. Sepsis in elderly patients: the role of neutrophils in pathophysiology and therapy. Intern Emerg Med 2024;19:901-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-023-03515-1

Clifford KM, Dy-Boarman EA, Haase KK, et al. Challenges with diagnosing and managing sepsis in older adults. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2016;14:231-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1586/14787210.2016.1135052

Lee HY, Lee J, Jung YS, et al. Preexisting clinical frailty is associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis. Crit Care Med 2022;50:780-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005360

Church S, Rogers E, Rockwood K, Theou O. A scoping review of the clinical frailty scale. BMC Geriatr 2020;20:393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01801-7

Von Groote T, Meersch-Dini M. Biomarkers for the prediction and judgement of sepsis and sepsis complications: a step towards precision medicine? J Clin Med 2022;11:5782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195782

Sullivan RC, Rockstrom MD, Schmidt EP, et al. Endothelial glycocalyx degradation during sepsis: causes and consequences. Matrix Biol Plus 2021;12:100094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbplus.2021.100094

Tang Y, Fung E, Xu A, Lan HY. C-reactive protein and ageing. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2017;44:9-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1681.12758

Lo Buglio A, Bellanti F, Talia M, et al. Reliability of serum procalcitonin concentration for the diagnosis of sepsis in elderly patient with chronic kidney disease. JGG 2016;64:49-54.

Thomas-Rüddel DO, Poidinger B, Kott M, et al. Influence of pathogen and focus of infection on procalcitonin values in sepsis patients with bacteremia or candidemia. Crit Care 2018;22:128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2050-9

Hatzistilianou M. Diagnostic and prognostic role of procalcitonin in infections. ScientificWorldJournal 2010;10:1941-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2010.181

Wirz Y, Meier MA, Bouadma L, et al. Effect of procalcitonin-guided antibiotic treatment on clinical outcomes in intensive care unit patients with infection and sepsis patients: a patient-level meta-analysis of randomized trials. Crit Care 2018;22:191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2125-7

Heilmann E, Gregoriano C, Annane D, et al. Duration of antibiotic treatment using procalcitonin-guided treatment algorithms in older patients: a patient-level meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials. Age Ageing 2021;50:1546-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab078

Falcone M, Bauer M, Ferrer R, et al. Biomarkers for risk stratification and antibiotic stewardship in elderly patients. Aging Clin Exp Res 2023;35:925-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-023-02388-w

Zhao Y, Li C. Diagnostic value of a combination of biomarkers in patients with sepsis and severe sepsis in emergency department. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue 2014;26:153-8. [Article in Chinese].

Ahuja N, Mishra A, Gupta R, Ray S. Biomarkers in sepsis-looking for the holy grail or chasing a mirage! World J Crit Care Med 2023;12:188-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v12.i4.188

Pilotto A, Dini S, Daragjati J, et al. Combined use of the multidimensional prognostic index (MPI) and procalcitonin serum levels in predicting 1-month mortality risk in older patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP): a prospective study. Aging Clin Exp Res 2018;30:193-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-017-0759-y

Liu B, Chen YX, Yin Q, et al. Diagnostic value and prognostic evaluation of Presepsin for sepsis in an emergency department. Crit Care 2013;17:R244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc13070

Christ-Crain M, Morgenthaler NG, Stolz D, et al. Pro-adrenomedullin to predict severity and outcome in community-acquired pneumonia [ISRCTN04176397]. Crit Care 2006;10:R96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc4955

Li Q, Wang BS, Yang L, et al. Assessment of adrenomedullin and proadrenomedullin as predictors of mortality in septic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Intensiva 2018;42:416-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medin.2017.10.013

Huang Q, Xiong H, Yan P, et al. The diagnostic and prognostic value of suPAR in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Shock 2020;53:416-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000001434

Zhao J, Zhang Y, Wang JY, et al. Correlation analyses between serum interleukin-7, interleukin-15 and lactate provide insights into their potential roles in the regulation of inflammation in elderly septic patients. Biomark Insights 2024;19:11772719241275525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/11772719241275525

Kumar NR, Balraj TA, Shivashankar KK, et al. Inflammaging in multidrug-resistant sepsis of geriatric ICU patients and healthcare challenges. Geriatrics 2024;9:45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics9020045

Ibarz M, Haas LEM, Ceccato A, Artigas A. The critically ill older patient with sepsis: a narrative review. Ann Intensive Care 2024;14:6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-023-01233-7

Liu C, Suo S, Luo L, et al. SOFA score in relation to sepsis: clinical implications in diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic assessment. Comput Math Methods Med 2022;2022:7870434. Retraction in: Comput Math Methods Med 2023;2023:9856196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7870434

Remelli F, Castellucci F, Vitali A, et al. Predictive value of geriatric-quickSOFA in hospitalized older people with sepsis. BMC Geriatr 2021;21:241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02182-1

Moreno R, Rhodes A, Piquilloud L, et al. The sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score: has the time come for an update? Crit Care 2023;27:15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04468-9

Bastoni D, Ticinesi A, Lauretani F, et al. Application of the sepsis-3 consensus criteria in a geriatric acute care unit: a prospective study. J Clin Med 2019;8:359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8030359

Minne L, Abu-Hanna A, de Jonge E. Evaluation of SOFA-based models for predicting mortality in the ICU: a systematic review. Crit Care 2008;12:R161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc7160

Falsetti L, Martino M, Zaccone V, et al. SOFA and qSOFA usefulness for in-hospital death prediction of elderly patients admitted for suspected infection in internal medicine. Infection 2020;48:879-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-020-01494-5

Ramos-Rincón JM, Fernández-Gil A, Merino E, et al. The quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment (qSOFA) is a good predictor of in-hospital mortality in very elderly patients with bloodstream infections: a retrospective observational study. Sci Rep 2019;9:15075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51439-8

Goodacre S, Fuller G, Conroy S, Hendrikse C. Diagnosis and management of sepsis in the older adult. BMJ 2023;382:e075585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-075585

Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med 2021;47:1181-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y

Brown RM, Semler MW. Fluid management in sepsis. J Intensive Care Med 2019;34:364-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066618784861

Caironi P, Tognoni G, Masson S, et al; ALBIOS study investigators. Albumin replacement in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1412-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1305727

Lesur O, Delile E, Asfar P, et al. Hemodynamic support in the early phase of septic shock: a review of challenges and unanswered questions. Ann Intensive Care 2018;8:102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0449-8

IDSA Sepsis Task Force. Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) POSITION STATEMENT: why IDSA did not endorse the surviving sepsis campaign guidelines. Clin Infect Dis 2018;66:1631-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix997

Sulis G, Sayood S, Katukoori S, et al. Exposure to World Health Organization’s AWaRe antibiotics and isolation of multidrug resistant bacteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2022;28:1193-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2022.03.014