Closeness as a mediator in providing and receiving social support on the social well-being of older persons in Kitui County, Kenya
https://doi.org/10.4081/gc.2021.10293
Accepted: 1 March 2022
Appendix: 46
HTML: 3
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research on the social well-being (SWB) of older persons in relation to social support provided and received has generated considerable amount of scholarly debate. Social support received or provided has been found in literature to produce mixed effects (positive and negative) on SWB, necessitating further research. The current study provides Kenyan evidence to a corpus of research mostly focused on European and American studies, contributing to the current discussion on SWB. Thus, the aim of the present study is to investigate how closeness to close network members (CNM) influences older persons’ satisfaction with social support provided and received. The study adopted a descriptive cross-sectional study design and mixed methods approach. Chi-square analyses were conducted, and the results revealed that there was a significant relationship between closeness and satisfaction with providing social support with exact P value of 0.002. In addition, there was a significant relationship between closeness and satisfaction with received social support with exact P value of 0.000 (P<0.05). The research highlights that closeness to CNM enhances SWB when older persons provide or receive social support.
Keyes CLM. Social well-being. Social Psychol Quart 1998;121-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2787065
Cobb CW. Measurement tools and the quality of life. San Francisco: Redefining Progress; 2000.
Pantisano F, Craglia M, Rosales-Sanchez C. New indicators of quality of life: A review of the literature, projects and applications. European Commission. 2014.
Atkinson S. Health and Wellbeing. International Encyclopedia of Geography: People, the Earth, Environment and Technology: People, the Earth, Environment and Technology. 2016;1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0770
Diener E, Lucas RE, Oishi S. Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. Handbook of Positive Psychology. 2002;2:63-73.
Camfield L, Esposito L. A cross-country analysis of perceived economic status and life satisfaction in high-and low-income countries. World Develop 2014;59:212-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.018
Elliott SJ, Dixon J, Bisung E, Kangmennaang J. A glowing footprint: developing an index of wellbeing for low to middle income countries. Int J Wellbeing 2017;7:2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v7i2.503
Government of Keny (GOK), United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). The State of Kenya Population 2020 - ‘Zero Harmful Practices - Accelerating the Promise of ICPD25.’ Nairobi: National Council for Population and Development; 2020 p. 52.
Mutegi SI. The experiences of the elderly people in accessing health care services in meru south district of eastern province. [PhD Thesis]. University of Nairobi; 2005.
Muli R. Forms, patterns and predicators of elder abuse in Machakos County, Kenya [PhD Thesis]. [Kenya]: Kenyatta University; 2019.
Brajša-Žganec A, Kaliterna-Lipovčan L, Hanzec I. The relationship between social support and subjective well-being across the lifespan. Društvena Istraživanja 2018;27:47-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5559/di.27.1.03
Boreham P, Povey J, Tomaszewski W. An alternative measure of social wellbeing: Analysing the key conceptual and statistical components of quality of life. Austr J Social Iss 2013;48:151-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1839-4655.2013.tb00276.x
Brown SL, Nesse RM, Vinokur AD, Smith DM. Providing social support may be more beneficial than receiving it: Results from a prospective study of mortality. Psychol Sci 2003;14:320-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.14461
Thomas PA. Is it better to give or to receive? Social support and the well-being of older adults. J Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Social Sci 2010;65:351-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbp113
Wang H-H, Wu S-Z, Liu Y-Y. Association between social support and health outcomes: a meta-analysis. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2003;19:345-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70436-X
Castellá Sarriera J, Bedin L, Calza T, Abs D, Casas F. Relationship between social support, life satisfaction and subjective well-being in Brazilian adolescents. Univers Psychol 2015;14:459-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy14-2.rbss
Umberson D, Montez J. Social relationships and health: a flashpoint for health policy. J Health Social Behav 2010;51:S54-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510383501
Morelli SA, Lee IA, Arnn ME, Zaki J. Emotional and instrumental support provision interact to predict well-being. Emotion 2015;15:484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000084
Dykstra PA. Aging and social support. In: 2nd ed. Erasmus University Rotterdam: In Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology; 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosa033.pub2
Lepore SJ, Glaser DB, Roberts KJ. On the positive relation between received social support and negative affect: a test of the triage and self-esteem threat models in women with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncol 2008;17:1210-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1347
Merz E-M, Schuengel C, Schulze H-J. Intergenerational relations across 4 years: Well-being is affected by quality, not by support exchange. Gerontologist 2009;49:536-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnp043
Thomas PA, Liu H, Umberson D. Family relationships and well-being. Innov Aging 2017;1:igx025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igx025
Rook KS, Charles ST. Close social ties and health in later life: strengths and vulnerabilities. Amer Psychol 2017;72:567.
Rook KS, Charles ST. Close social ties and health in later life: Strengths and vulnerabilities. Amer Psychol 2017;72:567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000104
Woods SB, Priest JB, Roberson PN. Family versus intimate partners: Estimating who matters more for health in a 20-year longitudinal study. J Family Psychol 2019 [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000600
Seltzer JA, Bianchi SM. Demographic change and parent-child relationships in adulthood. Annu Rev Sociol 2013;39:275-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145602
Nguyen AW, Chatters LM, Taylor RJ, Mouzon DM. Social support from family and friends and subjective well-being of older African Americans. J Happiness Stud 2016;17:959-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9626-8
Cain CL, Wallace SP, Ponce NA. Helpfulness, trust, and safety of neighborhoods: Social capital, household income, and self-reported health of older adults. Gerontologist 2018;58:4-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx145
Seifert A, König R. Help from and help to neighbors among older adults in Europe. Front Sociol 2019;4:46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2019.00046
Merz E-M, Huxhold O. Wellbeing depends on social relationship characteristics: Comparing different types and providers of support to older adults. Ageing Society 2010;30:843-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X10000061
Bøen H, Dalgard OS, Bjertness E. The importance of social support in the associations between psychological distress and somatic health problems and socio-economic factors among older adults living at home: a cross sectional study. BMC Geriatr 2012;12:1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-12-27
Copyright (c) 2021 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Downloads
Citations
