Notes on Surgical Technique

Comparative study between ultrasound guided erector spinae block versus thoracic paravertebral block versus quadratus lamborum block for postoperative analgesia after open renal surgeries: a prospective randomized controlled study

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 21 May 2026
Published: 31 July 2026
31
Views
11
Downloads

Authors

Background: Open renal surgeries are associated with significant postoperative pain, which may delay recovery and increase opioid requirements. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques such as erector spinae plane block (ESPB), thoracic paravertebral block (PVB), and quadratus lumborum block (QLB) have emerged as effective components of multimodal analgesia.

Objective: To compare the analgesic efficacy of ESPB, PVB, and QLB versus systemic analgesia in patients undergoing elective open renal surgeries.

Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled study included 48 patients (ASA I-II) undergoing open renal surgery. Patients were allocated into four groups (n = 12 each): ESPB, PVB, QLB (each received 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine), and control (IV morphine). Postoperative pain was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at 2, 4, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours. Total 24-hour morphine consumption and patient satisfaction were recorded.

Results: VAS scores were significantly lower in all block groups compared to the control group at all-time points (p < 0.001), with no significant differences among ESPB, PVB, and QLB. Total morphine consumption was highest in the control group (25.0 ± 4.5 mg), followed by ESPB (12.0 ± 3.2 mg), PVB (10.0 ± 2.8 mg), and QLB (8.0 ± 2.5 mg) (p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the block groups, particularly in the QLB group.

Conclusions: ESPB, PVB, and QLB provide effective postoperative analgesia and reduce opioid consumption after open renal surgeries. QLB demonstrated the most favorable opioid-sparing effect, although all techniques showed comparable analgesic efficacy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

1. Elkhodary A, Khalil R, Elbarbary DH, et al. Comparison between Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block and Quadratus Lumborum Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Patient Undergoing Open Nephrectomy. Benha Med J. 2025; 42:434-43.

2. Albers KI, van Helden EV, Dahan A, et al. Early postoperative pain after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy predicts 30-day postoperative infectious complications: a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pain 2020; 161:1565-70.

3. Zhang Z, Kong H, Li Y, et al. Erector spinae plane block versus quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic

nephrectomy: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth. 2024; 96:111466.

4. Gerbershagen HJ, Dagtekin O, Rothe T, et al. Risk factors for acute and chronic postoperative pain in patients with benign and malignant renal disease after nephrectomy. Eur J pain. 2009; 13:853-60.

5. Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, et al. The erector spinae plane block: a novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathic pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016; 41:621-27.

6. Abd Ellatif SE, Abdelnaby SM. Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block versus quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia in patient undergoing open nephrectomy: a randomized controlled study. Eg J Anesth. 2021; 37:123-34.

7. Elsayed AA, Algyar MF, Arafa SK. Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block, paravertebral block and quadratus lumborum block for pelvi-ureteric surgeries: a randomized double blind, no inferiority trial. Pain Physician. 2024; 27:1055-63.

8. Tawfic QA, Bellingham G. Postoperative pain management in patients with chronic kidney disease. J Anaesth Clin Pharmacol. 2015; 31:6-13.

9. An Y, Li L, Li Z, et al. Anterior quadratus lumborum block is superior to erector spinae plane block for analgesia after renal transplantation: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025; 25:343.

10. Capuano P, Burgio G, Abbate S, et al. Continuous erector spinae plane block for pain management in a pediatric kidney transplant recipient: A case report and review of the current literature. J Clin Med. 2024; 13:1128.

11. Składzie´n T, Maciejewski P, Szpunar W, et al. Effects of erector spinae plane block and quadratus lumborum block on post-operative opioid consumption in laparoscopic prostatectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2025; 57:267-75.

12. Abdelgalil AS, Ahmed AM, Gamal RM, et al. Ultrasound guided continuous erector spinae plane block versus patient controlled analgesia in open nephrectomy for renal malignancies: a randomized controlled study. J Pain Res. 2022; 15:3093-3102.

Ethics Approval

The study had been approved by Institutional Review Board (IRB) (No. 00394 /2023) with accepted at clinical trial registration (NCT05890248) at June 2023. https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT05890248

CRediT authorship contribution

MA, MB, AM, MA: manuscript preparation, protocol, data collection and management, manuscript editing. MH, WM, HO, TE: Data acquisition, data analysis and management, manuscript editing.  ME. EM, TA: Manuscript editing, project development, data analysis, and project development. All the authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Supporting Agencies

None

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

How to Cite



Comparative study between ultrasound guided erector spinae block versus thoracic paravertebral block versus quadratus lamborum block for postoperative analgesia after open renal surgeries: a prospective randomized controlled study. (2026). Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2026.15675