Original Papers - Incontinence & Urodynamics Open access

The effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on hypospadias reconstruction: a preliminary randomized controlled trial study of VEGF levels and HOPE score analysis

Authors

Published
20 March 2025
Section
Original Papers - Incontinence & Urodynamics
DOI
10.4081/aiua.2025.13342

Abstract

Introduction: Hypospadias is a congenital abnormality of the urethral meatus in males. Hypospadias can be corrected by two-stage urethroplasty. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) can accelerate wound healing after surgery by increasing oxygenation, angiogenesis, and collagen synthesis. This study aimed to measure the effectivity of HBOT based on serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) level and Hypospadias Objective Penile Evaluation (HOPE) score in hypospadias reconstruction patients.
Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial study. Hypospadias reconstruction was performed using the Sidik-Chaula and Manset Flap techniques. Each HBOT session ranged from 30-60 minutes, administered at 1-3 atm. Twenty subjects were divided into two groups: the HBOT and control groups. VEGF serum levels were measured 1 hour after the operation and 1 hour after every HBOT session. The HOPE score was assessed at the bedside by the attending physician, consisting of six items: the position of the meatus, the shape of the meatus, the shape of the glans, the shape of the penile skin, and the shape of the penile axis, including penile torsion and penile curvature. The data were analyzed with SPSS version 28, using the Shapiro-Wilk and independent t-test methods.
Results: There was a trend of increasing VEGF levels as the number of HBOT sessions increased, with significant increase found in patients who underwent three (p=0.038), four (p=0.002), and five (p=0.008) HBOT sessions. We found a significant increase in the total HOPE score (p=0.028) and penile torsion score (p=0.006) in the HBOT group.
Conclusions: HBOT can accelerate wound healing after urethroplasty. Three or more HBOT sessions are recommended after the repair of hypospadias.

Keywords

References

  1. Turkyilmaz Z, Karabulut R, Atan A, Sonmez K. Redo Hypospadias Repair: Comparison of Three Different Methods. Urol Int. 2020; 104:391-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000504947
  2. Snodgrass W, Bush N. Staged Tubularized Autograft Repair for Primary Proximal Hypospadias with 30-Degree or Greater Ventral Curvature. J Urol. 2017;198:680-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.04.019
  3. Shinomiya N. Molecular mechanisms of hyperbaric oxygen therapy. In: Shinomiya N, Asai Y (eds) Hyperbaric oxygenation therapy. Springer, Singapore 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7836-2
  4. Neheman A, Rappaport YH, Verhovsky G, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for pediatric “hypospadias cripple” - evaluating the advantages regarding graft take. J Pediatr Urol. 2020; 16:163.e1-163.e7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.01.002
  5. Chang C, White C, Katz A, Hanna MK. Management of ischemic tissues and skin flaps in Re-Operative and complex hypospadias repair using vasodilators and hyperbaric oxygen. J Pediatr Urol. 2020; 16:672.e1-672.e8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.07.034
  6. Ghahestani SM, Ahmadi A, Pashazadeh F, Lotfi B. Validity and reliability of thepPersian version of hypospadias objective penile evaluation (HOPE) questionnaire. J-Res-Urol. 2022; 6:15-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32592/jru.6.1.15
  7. Krull S, Rissmann A, Krause H, et al. Outcome after hypospadias repair: evaluation using the hypospadias objective penile evaluation score. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2018; 28:268-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1602252
  8. Neheman A, Carr N, Beberashvili I, et al. Predictors for cosmetic outcomes in hypospadias repair: prospective assessment based on validated questionnaires. J Urol. 2022;207:e128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002530.08
  9. van der Toorn F, de Jong TPVM, de Gier RPE, et al. Introducing the HOPE (Hypospadias Objective Penile Evaluation)-score: A validation study of an objective scoring system for evaluating cosmetic appearance in hypospadias patients. J Pediatr Urol. 2013; 9:1006-16.
  10. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010;340:c332-c332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c332
  11. Sukasah CL, Supit L. Sidik-Chaula urethroplasty and the manset flap for non-glanular hypospadias repair. Jurnal Plastik Rekonstruksi. 2012;1:74-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14228/jpr.v1i1.35
  12. van der Toorn F, de Jong TPVM, de Gier RPE, et al. Introducing the HOPE (Hypospadias Objective Penile Evaluation)-score: A validation study of an objective scoring system for evaluating cosmetic appearance in hypospadias patients. J Pediatr Urol. 2013; 9:1006-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.01.015
  13. Anand S, Lotfollahzadeh S. Hypospadias urogenital reconstruction. 2023 Jun 3. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2024.
  14. Ahmad R, Chana R, Ali S, Khan S. Role of parenteral testosterone in hypospadias: A study from a teaching hospital in India. Urol Ann. 2011; 3:138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.84966
  15. Skarin Nordenvall A, Norrby C, Butwicka A, et al. Psychosocial outcomes in adult men born with hypospadias: A register-based study. PLoS One 2017;12:e0174923. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174923
  16. Kocherov S, Lev G, Chertin B. Use of bioglue surgical adhesive in hypospadias repair. Curr Urol. 2014; 7:132-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000356265
  17. Shenoy NS, Tiwari C, Gandhi S, et al. Efficacy of fibrin sealant as waterproof cover in improving outcome in hypospadias surgery. Afr J Paediatr Surg. India 2021;18:215-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ajps.AJPS_132_20
  18. Sultan TA, Faktry TA, Nabil A, Shenishn MZ. Prospective comparative study of hypospadias surgical repair with and without the use of fibrin sealant. Intl Surgery J. 2019;6:2722. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20193315
  19. Atici A, Celikkaya M, El C, Akcora B. Results of surgery performed on 151 patients of hypospadias: single center experience. Ulutas Med J. 2019;5:48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/umj.20181210085830
  20. Donaire AE, Mendez MD. Hypospadias. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2024.
  21. Appeadu-Mensah W, Hesse AJ, Glover-Addy H, et al. Complications of hypospadias surgery: Experience in a tertiary hospital of a developing country. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2015; 12:211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0189-6725.172538
  22. Oley MH, Oley MC, Noersasongko AD, et al. Effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on vascular endothelial growth factor protein and mRNA in crush injury patients: A randomized controlled trial study. Int J Surg Open 2021;29:33-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijso.2021.01.003
  23. Springer A. Assessment of outcome in hypospadias surgery – a review. Front Pediatr. 2014; 2:2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2014.00002
  24. Agrawal K, Misra A. Unfavourable results in hypospadias. Indian J Plastic Surg. 2013;46:419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.118623
  25. Hong WX, Hu MS, Esquivel M, et al. The role of hypoxia-inducible factor in wound healing. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2014; 3:390-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2013.0520
  26. Xue M, Jackson CJ. Extracellular matrix reorganization during wound healing and its impact on abnormal scarring. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2015;4:119-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2013.0485
  27. Liu Z-J, Velazquez OC. Angiogenesis in wound healing. In: DA Dartt (ed) Encyclopedia of the Eye. Academic Press; 2010. pp 99-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374203-2.00124-X
  28. Peña-Villalobos I, Casanova-Maldonado I, Lois P, et al. hyperbaric oxygen increases stem cell proliferation, angiogenesis and wound-healing ability of WJ-MSCs in diabetic mice. Front Physiol. 2018; 9:995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00995
  29. Shams F, Moravvej H, Hosseinzadeh S, et al. Overexpression of VEGF in dermal fibroblast cells accelerates the angiogenesis and wound healing function: in vitro and in vivo studies. Sci Rep. 2022;12:18529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23304-8

Author Biography

  • Muhammad Faruk, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar

     

Metrics

Citations and online attention from Dimensions, Altmetric and PlumX.

PlumX Metrics

License

Copyright (c) 2025 the Author(s)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.