https://doi.org/10.4081/vl.2026.14898
Dermal substitutes in the treatment of venous ulcers
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 7 April 2026
Venous ulcers are the most common ulcerative lesions of the lower limbs and represent a major clinical challenge, particularly in the geriatric population. Chronic cutaneous ulcers are frequently associated with cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities, which impair tissue repair and prolong healing. Pain is the predominant symptom, resulting from exposure of deeper epithelial layers to inflammatory and irritative processes. Diagnosis relies on clinical evaluation, venous colour Doppler ultrasonography, and laboratory investigations. Treatment is guided by ulcer aetiology and includes compression therapy, advanced wound dressings, surgical debridement, negative pressure wound therapy, and dermal substitutes.
Because the extracellular matrix plays a dynamic role in tissue regeneration, therapeutic strategies emphasise wound bed preparation and acellular dermal matrices. These biomaterials provide a non-immunogenic scaffold that supports cell migration while avoiding donor-site morbidity. In a retrospective observational study of 62 patients with chronic cutaneous ulcers, predominantly venous, an integrated therapeutic approach combining surgery, selective debridement, and regenerative biomaterials resulted in clinical improvement in 71.29% of patients. Dermal substitutes were associated with a marked reduction in postoperative pain, with NRS scores decreasing from 6-7 to 0-3 overall.
Downloads
1. Krizanova O, Krizanova O, Penesova A, et al. Chronic venous insufficiency and venous leg ulcers: pathophysiology and treatment options. Int Wound J 2023;21:e14405-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14405
2. Guarnera G. Ulcere vascolari degli arti inferiori. Minerva Medica; Turin, Italy; 2016.
3. Schultz GS, Sibbald RG, Falanga V, et al. Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management. Wound Repair Regen 2003;11:S1-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-475X.11.s2.1.x
4. Andleeb A, Khan H, Andleeb A, et al. Advances in chronic wound management: from conventional treatment to novel therapies and biological dressings.
Crit Rev Biomed Eng 2024;52:29-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2024053066
5. Zaver V, Kankanalu P. Negative pressure wound therapy. 2025. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35015413/
6. Jansen LA, De Caigny P, Guay NA, et al: The evidence base for the acellular dermal matrix: a systematic review. Ann Plast Surg 2013;70:587-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31827a2d23
7. Eming SA, Mertin P, Tomic-Canic M. Wound repair and regeneration: mechanisms, signaling and translation. Sci Transl Med 2014;6:265sr6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3009337
8. Rodero MP, Khosrotehrani K. Skin wound healing modulation bymacrophages. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2010;3:643-53.
9. Williams T, Garg SP, Fine K, et al. The use of acellular products in venous leg ulcers: a narrative review. Wounds 2024;36:234-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25270/wnds/23107
10. Guarnera G, Valle P, Zamboni P. School of Phlebological Surgery: an innovative training under the auspices of the Italian Society of Surgery and of Vascular end Endovascular Surgery. Veins and Lymphatics 2024;13:12854. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/vl.2024.12854
How to Cite

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.

