Original Articles
Vol. 25 No. 4 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.4081/mm.2010.2407

Comparison of three assays currently used for diagnosis of legionellosis

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 14 February 2014
Published: 31 December 2010
1285
Views
1055
Downloads
Legionella pneumophila, cultures, urinary antigen, antibody research

Authors

Maria Chiucini
chiucini@yahoo.it
, .
Anna Fabio
, .
Marisa Meacci
, .
Barbara Meccugni
, .
Valentina Gilioli
, .
Valeria Petocchi
, .
Giuliana Fabio
, .
Anna Maria Teresa Sabbatini
, .
Sara Tagliazucchi
, .
Sandra Mattioli
, .
Fabio Rumpianesi
, .
The laboratory diagnosis of Legionnaires’ disease is extremely complex due to the difficulty of isolating and identifying the etiological agent in a short time and also for the frequent late appearance of antibodies. For this reason it should use not only the cultures but also other diagnostic tests such as urinary antigen and antibody research. Our study evaluated the performance of these methods.We calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity and specificity of each test.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite



Comparison of three assays currently used for diagnosis of legionellosis. (2010). Microbiologia Medica, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.4081/mm.2010.2407

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.