Original Articles

Advancing antimicrobial susceptibility testing in body fluid-associated infections: a focus on direct testing for timely and targeted therapeutic interventions

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 8 January 2025
Accepted: 4 March 2025
Published: 4 August 2025
392
Views
188
Downloads
13
HTML

Authors

Background: timely Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST) is critical in managing infections, particularly with the rise of multidrug-resistant organisms. This study evaluates the efficacy of Direct AST (D-AST) on body fluids in reducing turnaround time compared to Routine AST (R-AST).

Materials and Methods: over six months, 43 monobacterial body fluid samples were analyzed using both D-AST and R-AST at a tertiary care hospital. D-AST was performed on the same day of sample receipt, while R-AST followed Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Concordance between the methods was statistically assessed.

Results: D-AST showed high concordance with R-AST for most antibiotics (p>0.05), with a significant reduction in turnaround time (D-AST: 24-36 hours; R-AST: 48-72 hours). For Gram-negative organisms, discrepancies were noted for amikacin sensitivity in Escherichia coli (D-AST: 76.19%; R-AST: 90.4%) and ciprofloxacin in Klebsiella pneumoniae (D-AST: 80%; R-AST: 100%). Gram-positive organisms showed 100% concordance for key antibiotics like linezolid and teicoplanin.

Conclusions: D-AST is a reliable, rapid alternative to R-AST, enabling earlier therapeutic decisions and reducing empirical antibiotic use. It shows promise in improving outcomes and combating antimicrobial resistance, particularly in resource-limited settings. Further standardization is needed for broader application.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Cassini A, Hogberg LD, Plachouras D, et al. Attributable deaths and disability-adjusted life-years caused by infections with antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the EU and the European Economic Area in 2015: a population-level modeling analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2019;19:56-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30605-4
Cercenado E, Cercenado S, Marín M, et al. Evaluation of direct E-test on lower respiratory tract samples: a rapid and accurate procedure for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2007;58:211-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.12.021
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). CLSI M100. Available from: https://clsi.org/media/pjfbviql/m100ed34e_sample.pdf
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 32nd ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; Berwyn, USA; 2022.
Doern GV, Vautour R, Gaudet M, et al. Clinical impact of rapid in vitro susceptibility testing and bacterial identification. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:1757-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.32.7.1757-1762.1994
Ellner PD, Johnson E. Unreliability of direct antibiotic susceptibility testing on wound exudates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1976;9:355-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.9.2.355
European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Guidelines for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing in blood cultures. 2022. Available from: https://www.eucast.org/rapid_ast_in_bloodcultures
Fahim M, Hawley CM, McDonald SP, et al. Culture-negative peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients in Australia: predictors, treatment, and outcomes in 435 cases. Am J Kidney Dis 2010;55:690-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.11.015
Li PKT, Chow KM, van de Luijtgaarden MWM, et al. Changes in the worldwide epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis. Nat Rev Nephrol 2017;13:90-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2016.181
McGuire A, Carson CF, Inglis T, Chakera A. Effects of a statewide protocol for the management of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis on microbial profiles and antimicrobial susceptibilities: a retrospective five-year review. Peritoneal Dialysis Int 2015;35:722-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2014.00117
Roca I, Akova M, Baquero F, et al. The global threat of antimicrobial resistance: science for intervention. New Microbes New Infect 2015;6:22-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2015.02.007
Salzer WL. Peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis: challenges and solutions. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis 2018;11:173-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJNRD.S123618
van Belkum A, Bachmann TT, Ludke G, et al. Developmental roadmap for antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems. Nat Rev Microbiol 2019;17:51-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-018-0098-9
Veron L, Mailler S, Girard V, et al. Rapid urine preparation prior to identification of uropathogens by MALDI-TOF MS. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2015;34:1787-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-015-2413-y

How to Cite



Advancing antimicrobial susceptibility testing in body fluid-associated infections: a focus on direct testing for timely and targeted therapeutic interventions. (2025). Microbiologia Medica, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/mm.2025.13602