Original Articles

Bacteriological profile in patients having chronic dacryocystitis presenting for cataract surgery in a tertiary care centre

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 22 June 2024
Published: 22 May 2025
697
Views
222
Downloads
22
HTML

Authors

Background: the clinical research specifies that patients with clogged Nasolacrimal Ducts (NLDs) are more likely to cause infectious endophthalmitis secondary to cataract surgery. The current study assessed the bacteriological profile and antimicrobial susceptibility among patients of chronic dacryocystitis presenting for cataract surgery.

Materials and Methods: a cross-sectional study was done on 62 patients with clinically diagnosed chronic dacryocystitis. All patients underwent syringing of the nasolacrimal duct with sterile normal saline under local anaesthesia, and a nasolacrimal regurgitation sample from the lower punctum was collected. The swabs were collected, and organisms were grown on suitable medium. Antibiotic susceptibility was also tested.

Results: chronic dacryocystitis was observed in 7.9% of patients. The growth of Gram-positive organisms was greater than Gram-negative organisms in both lacrimal sac content swabs (65%, 35%) and conjunctival swabs (76%, 24%), respectively. Out of 10 (35.7%) Gram-negative isolates, meropenem, gentamicin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactum, levofloxacin, cotrimoxazole were the most sensitive drugs (100%, 100%, 100%, 93.75%, 87.5%, 87.5%, 87.5%, respectively). Ampicillin and cefazolin (16.67% sensitivity in both) were the least sensitive in Gram-negative isolates.

Conclusions: knowledge of the bacteriological profile and antibioGram of chronic dacryocystitis prior to cataract surgery is essential to avert post-operative infections of the eye.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Asgin N, Cakmaklıogullari M. Bacterial profiles and antibiotic susceptibility pattern in patients with chronic dacryocystitis. J Surg Med 2020;4:217-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.699901

Assefa Y, Moges F, Endris M, et al. Bacteriological profile and drug susceptibility patterns in dacryocystitis patients attending Gondar University Teaching Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Ophthalmol 2015;15:34-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0016-0

Balikoglu-Yilmaz M, Esen AB, Yilmaz T, et al. Bacteriological profile in conjunctival, lacrimal sac, and nasal specimens and conjunctival normalization time following external, endoscopic, and transcanalicular multidiode laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2016;79:163-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.20160049

Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherries JC. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol 1996;45:493-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/45.4_ts.493

Bharathi MJ, Ramakrishnan R, Maneksha V, et al. Comparative bacteriology of acute and chronic dacryocystitis. Eye 2008;22:953-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702918

Briscoe D, Rubowitz A, Assia EI. Changing bacterial isolates and antibiotic sensitivities of purulent dacryocystitis. Orbit 2005;24:95-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01676830590926585

Chaudhary M, Bhattarai A, Adhikari SK, Bhatta DR. Bacteriology and antimicrobial susceptibility of adult chronic dacryocystitis. Nepal J Ophthalmol 2010;2:105-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/nepjoph.v2i2.3716

Collee J, Duguid J, Fraser A, et al. Laboratory strategy in the diagnosis of infective syndromes. Mackie and McCartney’s practical medical microbiology. Fourteenth edition. Churchill Livingstone, New York, USA, 2006.

Conrady CD, Feist RM JR, Vitale AT, Shakoor A. Long-term visual outcomes of endopthalmitis and the role of systemic steroids in addition to intravitreal dexamethasone. BMC Ophthalmol 2020;6:180-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01449-2

Delia AC, Uuri GC, Battacharjee K. Bacteriology of chronic dacryocystitis in adult population of northeast India. Orbit 2008;27:243-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01676830802224668

Gilliland G. Dacryocystitis. Textbook of ophthalmology. First edition. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Ltd., New Delhi, India, 2002.

Good WV, Hing S, Irvine AR. Postoperative endopthalmitis in children following surgery. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1990;27:283-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/0191-3913-19901101-03

Hayashi Y, Miyamoto T, Fujita S. Bacteriology of the conjunctiva in pre-cataract surgery patients with occluded nasolacrimal ducts and the operation outcomes in Japanese patients. BMC Ophthalmol 2017;17:10-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0410-x

Kam JK, Cheng NM, Allen PJ, Brooks AM. Nasolacrimal duct screening to minimize post- cataract surgery endopthalmitis. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2014;42:447-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.12244

Lewis J, Weinstein M, Bobenchik A, et al. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; thirty-second informational supplements. Clinical and Laboratory Standards 2022;2:1-10.

Luo B, Li M, Xiang N, et al. The microbiologic spectrum of dacryocystitis. BMC Ophthalmol 2021;21:1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01792-4

Majidaee M, Mohammadi M, Sheikh MR, et al. Patients undergoing dacryocystorhinostomy surgery in northern Iran: an epidemiologic study. Ann Med Health Sci Res 2014;4:365-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.133461

Owji N, Khalili MR. Normalization of conjunctival flora after dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;25:136-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0b013e31819a4255

Patel K, Magdum R, Sethia S, et al. A clinico-bateriological study of chronic dacryocystitis. Sudanese J Ophthalmol 2014;6:1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1858-540X.138842

Pinar-Sueiro S, Sota M, Lerchundi T, et al. Dacryocystitis: systematic approach to diagnosis and therapy. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2012;14:137-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-012-0238-8

Pradeep AV, Patil SS, Koti SV, et al. Clinico-bacteriological study of chronic dacryocystitis cases in northern Karnataka, India. J Clin Diagn Res 2013;7:2502-4.

Rizvi S, Rizvi M, Raut S, et al. Etiology and antimicrobial sensitivity pattern in acute and chronic dacryocystitis. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 2015;1:269-80.

Shahid E, Fasih U, Sabir M, Shaikh A. Bacteriology of chronic dacryocystitis in patients coming to a tertiary care hospital. Pak J Ophthalmol 2018;34:247-52.

Thomas R, Thomas S, Braganza A, Muliyil J. Evaluation of the role of syringing prior to cataract surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol 1997;45:211-4.

How to Cite



Bacteriological profile in patients having chronic dacryocystitis presenting for cataract surgery in a tertiary care centre. (2025). Microbiologia Medica, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/mm.2025.12741