Original Articles

Psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-PR25 and clinical correlates of quality of life among Albanian men with prostate cancer

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 25 January 2026
Published: 12 February 2026
152
Views
71
Downloads

Authors

Our aim was to assess the psychometric properties of the “EORTC QLQ-PR25” in Albania and to determine the links between disease characteristics and treatment in men with prostate cancer. A study conducted in Tirana during April 2024–December 2025 included 74 consecutive men diagnosed with prostate cancer who completed the EORTC QLQ-PR25 questionnaire (response: ≈94%). The EORTC QLQ-PR25 demonstrated excellent internal consistency across all subscales (Cronbach’s alpha range: 0.85-0.91), with very high reliability for the overall scale (α=0.94). Higher symptom burden and poorer overall quality-of-life were significantly associated with radical prostatectomy, metastatic disease, high Gleason score (9-10), and extracapsular tumour spread (all P<0.05). Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy reported the worst outcomes across all symptom domains, as well as the lowest general quality-of-life and health status scores. Seemingly, the EORTC QLQ-PR25 is a reliable and clinically valid instrument for assessing prostate cancer-specific quality-of-life among Albanian men. Also, symptom burden and quality-of-life impairment were strongly associated with disease severity and invasive treatment. Our findings support the integration of patient-reported outcomes into routine prostate cancer care in Albanian-speaking countries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

1. Lin X, Zhi Y. Global epidemiological trends in prostate cancer burden: a comprehensive analysis from Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Transl Androl Urol 2025;14:1238-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-2025-103

2. Zhang W, Cao G, Wu F, et al. Global burden of prostate cancer and association with socioeconomic Status, 1990–2019: A Systematic Analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study. J Epidemiol Glob Health 2023;13:407-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44197-023-00103-6

3. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2024;74:229-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21834

4. Schafer EJ, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Recent patterns and trends in global prostate cancer incidence and mortality: an update. Eur Urol 2025;87:302-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2024.11.013

5. Resnick MJ, Koyama T, Fan KH, et al. Long-term functional outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2013;368:436-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1209978

6. Rosato R, De Luca S, Zitella A, et al. Quality of life in low-risk prostate cancer under active surveillance or following radical treatments: the START cohort study. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2025;Oct 16. doi: 10.1038/s41391-025-01032-0. Online ahead of print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-025-01032-0

7. Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1250-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa074311

8. Seputra KP, Daryanto B, Budaya TN, et al. Quality of life in prostate cancer patients following radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2025;26:3185-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2025.26.9.3185

9. Rönningås U, Holm M, Fransson P, et al. Symptoms and quality of life among men starting treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer - a prospective multicenter study. BMC Palliat Care 2024;23:80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01410-w

10. Szymanski KM, Wei JT, Dunn RL, Sanda MG. Development and validation of an abbreviated version of the expanded prostate cancer index composite instrument for measuring health-related quality of life among prostate cancer survivors. Urology 2010;76:1245-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.01.027

11. Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, et al. 10-year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2016;375:1415-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1606220

12. Chen RC, Basak R, Meyer AM, et al. Association between choice of radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, or active surveillance and patient-reported quality of life among men with localized prostate cancer. JAMA 2017;317:1141-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.1652

13. Eton DT, Lepore SJ. Prostate cancer and health-related quality of life: a review of the literature. Psychooncology 2002;11:307-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.572

14. Kretschmer A, van den Bergh RCN, Martini A, et al. Assessment of health-related quality of life in patients with advanced prostate cancer — current state and future perspectives. Cancers 2022;14:147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14010147

15. Dasgupta P, Baade PD, Aitken JF, et al. Geographical variations in prostate cancer outcomes: a systematic review of international evidence. Front Oncol 2019;9:238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00238

16. Wadhwa A, Roscoe C, Duran EA, et al. Neighborhood deprivation, race and ethnicity, and prostate cancer outcomes across california health care systems. JAMA Netw Open 2024;7:e242852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.2852

17. Klein J, Hofreuter-Gätgens K, Lüdecke D, et al. Socioeconomic status and health-related quality of life among patients with prostate cancer 6 months after radical prostatectomy: a longitudinal analysis. BMJ Open 2016;6:e010968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010968

18. Monge C, Eldridge L, Pearlman PC, et al. Global perspectives on patient-centered outcomes: advancing patient-centered cancer clinical trials globally. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2025;2025:35-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgae043

19. van Andel G, Bottomley A, Fosså SD, et al. An international field study of the EORTC QLQ-PR25: a questionnaire for assessing the health-related quality of life of patients with prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer 2008;44:2418-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.07.030

20. Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care 2007;45:S3-S11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55

21. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:365-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/85.5.365

22. Jurys T, Smółka M, Dzierzawa-Kloza M, et al. EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-PR25 — tools for assessing the quality of life of men suffering from prostate cancer. Oncol Clin Pract 2022;18:61-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5603/OCP.2021.0040

23. O’Leary E, Drummond FJ, Gavin A, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the EORTC QLQ-PR25 questionnaire in assessing health-related quality of life in prostate cancer survivors: a curate’s egg. Qual Life Res 2015;24:2219-30. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-0958-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-0958-y

24. Park J, Shin DW, Yun SJ, et al. Cross-cultural application of the Korean version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for patients with prostate cancer - EORTC QLQ-PR25. Oncology 2013;85:299-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000355689

25. Chang YJ, Liang WM, Wu HC, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-PR25 for HRQOL assessment in prostate cancer patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012;10:96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-10-96

26. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:3186-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014

27. World Health Organization. Cancer country profile 2020: Albania. Accessed: 23 January 2026. Available from: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/country-profiles/cancer/alb_2020.pdf

28. Prifti J, Pozzo C, Najtellari E, Piccaluga PP. Cancer epidemiology in Albania: insights, challenges, and future directions. J Cancer Biomol Ther 2025;2:1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62382/jcbt.v2i3.65

29. Refatllari B, Stefa J, Gega M, et al. Prevalence of physical activity and its associated sociodemographic factors among schoolchildren in Albania. Healthc Low-Resource Settings 2025;13:13370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/hls.2025.13370

30. Balitsky AK, Rayner D, Britto J, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures in cancer care: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2024;7:e2424793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24793

How to Cite



Psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-PR25 and clinical correlates of quality of life among Albanian men with prostate cancer. (2026). Healthcare in Low-Resource Settings. https://doi.org/10.4081/hls.2026.14873