Articles

Seasonal variation in the diversity of Holoplankton and Meroplankton in relation with primary productivity and physicochemical parameters in the nearshore regions of the Visakhapatnam Coast, India

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 28 October 2024
Accepted: 25 March 2025
Published: 7 July 2025
415
Views
385
Downloads
16
HTML

Authors

The nearshore region of a coastal ecosystem is an everchanging, dynamic, transitional zone between land and open sea. It is a highly productive area because of sufficient sunlight and nutrients. The main aim of this research is to study the diversity and abundance of zooplankton especially holoplankton and meroplankton in relation with physicochemical factors for one year with their seasonality. Along with the diversity indices, multivariate ordination indices like Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) were applied to study the diversity and their relationship with physicochemical factors. PERMANOVA was also used to test whether the abundance and physicochemical factors differed significantly across sampling sites and seasons. The study showed that holoplankton diversity in the Fishing Harbour (FH) was highest during the pre-monsoon season and lowest during the post-monsoon season. The meroplankton diversity was the highest during the pre-monsoon season and lowest during the monsoon season which was also recorded from the FH. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) showed that Salinity, pH, dissolved oxygen and primary productivity as the significant physicochemical parameters affecting the Holoplankton and Meroplankton diversity. Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) for holoplankton showed that salinity, pH, dissolved oxygen and primary productivity were positively related with copepods. While non-copepod species were positively related with salinity, pH and dissolved oxygen except primary productivity. Similarly, meroplankton groups showed positive correlation with temperature only.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abdullah Al M, Akhtar A, Kamal AHM, et al., 2017. Seasonal pattern of zooplankton community and their environmental response in subtropical maritime channel systems in the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 38:316-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2017.11.001
Acha EM, Mianzan HW, Guerrero RA, et al., 2004. Marine fronts at the continental shelves of 550 austral South America physical and ecological processes. Journal of Marine Systems. 44:83-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2003.09.005
Achunthankutty CT, Madhupratap M, Nair SRS, Rao TSS, 1980. Zooplankton biomass and composition in the western Bay of Bengal during the late SW Monsoon. Indian Journal of Marine Science. 9:201-6.
Al- Yamani FY, Skryabin V, Gubanova A, et al., 2011. Marine Zooplankton Practical Guide. Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research; Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Aruga R, Negro G, Ostacoli G, 1993. Multivariate data analysis applied to the investigation of river pollution. Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 346:968-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00322761
Becker BJ, Levin LA, Fodrie FJ, McMillan PA, 2007. Complex larval connectivity patterns among marine invertebrate populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:3267-72 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0611651104
Brandão MC, Garcia CAE, Freire AS, 2020. Meroplankton community across oceanographic fronts along the South Brazil shelf. Journal of Marine Systems. 208:103361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2020.103361
Cardoso SJ, Roland F, Loverde-Oliveira SM, De Moraes Huszar VL, 2012. Phytoplankton abundance, biomass and diversity within and between Pantanal wetland habitats. Limnologica. 42:235-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2012.01.002
Dalal SG, Goswami SC, 2001. Temporal and ephemeral variations in copepod community in the estuaries of Mandovi and Zuari—west coast of India. Journal of Plankton Research. 23:19-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/23.1.19
Deevey GB, 1948. The zooplankton of Tisbury Great Pond. Bulletin of Bingham Oceanographic Collection. New Haven. 12:1-44.
Dias CO, Teixeira Bonecker AC, Salustiano de Castro M, et al., 2021. Holoplankton and meroplankton of the three western Atlantic Sedimentary Basins. Marine Biology Research. 16:695-713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000.2021.1894341
Dipper F, 2022. Elements of Marine Ecology. Fifth edition. Butterworth-Heinemann; Oxford, UK,
Fernandes V, Ramaiah N, 2009. Mesozooplankton community in the Bay of Bengal (India): Spatial variability during the summer monsoon. Aquatic Ecology. 43:951-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-008-9209-4
Fernandes V, Ramaiah N, 2019. Spatial structuring of zooplankton community through partitioning of habitat and resources in the Bay of Bengal during the spring intermonsoon. Turk Journal of Zoology. 43:68-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1805-6
Ganapati PN, Ramasarma DV, 1958. Hydrography in relation to the production of plankton off Waltair coast. Andhra University Memoir of Oceanography. 2:168-92.
Goswami SC, 1982. Distribution and biodiversity of copepods in the Mandovi–Zuari estuarine system. Indian Journal of Marine Science. 11:292-5.
Greenwood A, O’Riordan RM, Barnes DKA, 2001. Seasonality and vertical zonation of zooplankton in a semi-enclosed sea lough. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK. 81:213-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315401003666
Hitchcock GL, Lane P, Smith S, et al., 2002. Zooplankton distributions in coastal waters of the northern Arabian Sea, August, 1995. Deep Sea Res. Part-II Top. Stud. Oceanography. 49:2403-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(02)00042-5
Ismael AA, Dorgham MM, 2003. Ecological indices as a tool for assessing pollution in El-Dekhaila Harbour (Alexandria, Egypt). Oceanologia. 45:121-31.
Kasturirangan LR, (1963). A key to the Identification of the more common Planktonic Copepoda of Indian Coastal waters. Available from: https://cmarz.whoi.edu/resources/copepods/Key_Plankton_Copepoda_Indian_Coast_Waters_1963_Kasturirangan.pdf
Khandagale PA, Mhatre VD, Thomas S, 2022. Seasonal and spatial variability of zooplankton diversity in North Eastern Arabian Sea along the Maharashtra Coast. Journal of Marine Biological Association of India. 64:2293-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6024/jmbai.2022.64.1.2293-04
Lawrence D, Valiela I, Tomasky G, 2004. Estuarine calanoid copepod abundance in relation to season, salinity, and land-derived nitrogen loading, Waquoit Bay, MA. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 61:547-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2004.06.018
Magalhaes A, da Costa RM, Liang T-H, et al., 2006. Spatial and temporal distribution in density and biomass Pseudodiaptomus species (Copepoda: Calanoida) in the Caete´ River estuary (Amazon north of Brazil). Brazilian Journal of Biology. 66:421-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842006000300006
Munk P, Hansen, BW, Nielsen TG, Thomsen HA, 2003. Changes in plankton and communities across 730 hydrographic fronts off West Greenland. Journal of Plankton Research. 25:815-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/25.7.815
Lee O, Nash RDM, Danilowiz BS, 2005. Small-scale spatio-temporal variability in Icthyoplankton and Zooplankton Distribution in relation to a tidal mixing front in the Irish Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 62:1021-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icesjms.2005.04.016
Palumbi SR, 2003. Population genetics, demographic connectivity, and the design of marine reserves. Ecol Appl. 13:146-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0146:PGDCAT]2.0.CO;2
Pechenik JA, 1999. On the advantages and disadvantages of larval stages in benthic marine invertebrate life cycles. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 177:269-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps177269
Perumal NV, Rajkumar M, Perumal P, Rajasekhar KT, 2009. Journal of Environmental Biology. 30:1035-46.
Raghuprasad R, Jayaram R, 1954. Preliminary studies on certain changes in the Plankton and hydrobiological conditions associated with the swarming of Notiluca. Proceedings of Indian Academy of Science. 40:49-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03050400
Rakesh M, Raman AV, Sudarshan D, 2006. Discriminating zooplankton assemblages in Neritic and Oceanic waters: A case for the northeast coast of India, Bay of Bengal. Marine Environmental Research. 61:93-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2005.06.002
Ramaiah N, Chatterji A, Madhupratap N, 1996. A study on the zooplankton of the Budhabalanga Estuary, Orissa Coast. Proceedings of Indian National Science Academy. 62:1-4.
Razouls C, de Bovée F, Kouwenberg J, Desreumaux N, 2005-2015. Diversity and Geographic Distribution of Marine Planktonic Copepods. Available from: http://copepodes.obs banyuls.fr/en
Klais R, Lehtiniemi M, Rubene G, et al., 2016. Spatial and Temporal Variability of Zooplankton in a temperate semi-enclosed sea: Implications for monitoring design and long-term studies. Journal of Plankton Research. 38:652-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbw022
Sahu G, Mohanty AK, et al., 2010. Zooplankton diversity in the nearshore waters of Bay of Bengal, off the Rushikulya Estuary. The IUP Journal of Environmental Sciences. 4:61-85.
Santhanam P, Perumal P, 2003. Diversity of zooplankton in the Parangipettai coastal waters, southeast coast of India. Journal of Marine Biological Association of India. 45:144-51.
Shuvalov VS, 1980. Cyclopoid Copepods of Oithonidae family of the World Ocean. Nauka, Leningrad. 1-197.
Smith SL, Madhupratap M, 2005. Mesozooplankton of the Arabian Sea: Patterns influenced by seasons, upwelling and oxygen concentration Progresses in Oceanography. 65:214-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2005.03.007
Srichandan S, Balliarsingh SK, Prakash S, 2018. Zooplankton Research in Indian Seas: A Review. Journal of Ocean University of China. 17:1149-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-018-3463-4
Stephen R, 1988. Oncaeidae (Copepoda: Poecilostomatoida) in the Indian Ocean with comments on the species of Lubbockia and Conaea. Mahasagar. 21:35-43.
Vakati V, 2024. Copepod in Focus: Synthesis and Trends Overview, International Journal of Zoological Sciences. 4:18-22.
Wenning RJ, Erickson GA, 1994. Interpretation and analysis of complex environmental data using chemometric method. Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 13:446-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-9936(94)85026-7
Wooldridge TH, 1999. Estuarine zooplankton community structure and dynamics. In: Allanson BR, Baird D. (eds.), Estuaries of South Africa. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, United Kingdom. p. 141-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511525490.007
World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Editorial Board, 2024. World Register of Marine Species. Available from: https://www.marinespecies.org

How to Cite



Seasonal variation in the diversity of Holoplankton and Meroplankton in relation with primary productivity and physicochemical parameters in the nearshore regions of the Visakhapatnam Coast, India. (2025). Advances in Oceanography and Limnology, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/aiol.2025.13309