Original Articles
Vol. 15 (2026): Early Access
https://doi.org/10.4081/vl.2026.14891

Primary care-based assessment of chronic venous insufficiency: a cross-sectional analytical study

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 30 January 2026
Published: 16 March 2026
104
Views
45
Downloads

Authors

Chronic Venous Insufficiency (CVI) is a highly prevalent condition, often underdiagnosed in its early stages, with a significant impact on quality of life and healthcare costs. Early identification of the disease is crucial in the primary care setting to reduce future complications and disease progression. This study proposes a primary care-based screening model that identifies patients in general practitioners’ offices, followed by targeted duplex ultrasound examination.

The study involved 224 patients who underwent a questionnaire and venous duplex ultrasound examination of the lower limbs. Clinical, behavioral, disease perception, and ultrasound data were analyzed. Statistical analysis included correlation tests and non-parametric comparisons.

Age, body mass index, symptoms, and ultrasound parameters were significantly associated with the clinical severity of CVI. Duplex ultrasound confirmed anatomical alterations consistent with clinical severity. A strong correlation was observed between symptoms, disease perception, and motivation for treatment, as well as between the level of health information and adherence to therapeutic pathways.

The proposed two-step screening model appears useful for risk stratification in the primary care setting. Further studies are needed to validate this approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

1. Nicolaides AN, Labropoulos N. Burden and suffering in chronic venous disease. Adv Ther 2019;36:1-4.

2. Chiesa R, Marone EM, Limoni C, et al. Chronic venous insufficiency in Italy: the 24-cities cohort study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005;30:422-9.

3. Cires-Drouet RS, Fangyang L, Rosenberger S, et al. High prevalence of chronic venous disease among health care workers in the United States. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2020;8:224-30.

4. Davies AH. The seriousness of chronic venous disease: a review of real-world evidence. Adv Ther 2019;36:5-12.

5. Chiesa R, Marone EM, Limoni C, et al. Chronic venous disorders: correlation between visible signs, symptoms, and presence of functional disease. J Vasc Surg 2007;46:322-30.

6. De Maeseneer MG, Kakkos SK, et al. Editor's choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2022 clinical practice guidelines on the management of chronic venous disease of the lower limbs. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2022;63:184-267.

7. Albernaz LF, Albernaz DTS, Zignani FR et al. A comparison of tablet-based and paper-based venous insufficiency epidemiologic and economic study quality of life/symptom questionnaire for assessment of chronic venous disease. Phlebology 2024;39:37-43.

8. Agus GB, Allegra C, Arpaia G, et al. Collegio Italiano di Flebologia. Linee Guida. Revisione 2013. Acta Phlebol 2013;14:1-160.

9. Ebner H, Stillo F, Lanza G, et al. Linee Guida flebo-linfologiche SIF-SICVE 2016 della Società Italiana di Flebologia e della Società Italiana di Chirurgia Vascolare ed Endovascolare. Minerva Cardioangiol 2016;64:1-80.

10. Rabe E, Guex JJ, Puskas A, et al. Epidemiology of chronic venous disorders in geographically diverse populations: results from the Vein Consult Program. Int Angiol 2012;31:105-15.

11. Vuylsteke ME, Colman R, Thomis S, et al. An epidemiological survey of venous disease among general practitioner attendees in different geographical regions on the globe: the final results of the Vein Consult Program. Angiology 2018;69:779-85.

12. Silvia Rossetto, Giulia Baldazzi, Alessandra Gallo, Paolo Zamboni. Mesotherapy versus oral medical treatment of chronic venous insufficiency in a general practitioner setting - A randomized controlled trial. Veins and Lymphatics 2025;14:13189.

13. Beebe-Dimmer JL, Pfeifer JR, Engle JS, Schottenfeld D. The epidemiology of chronic venous insufficiency and varicose veins. Ann Epidemiol 2005;15:175-84.

14. Musil D, Kaletova M, Herman J. Age, body mass index and severity of primary chronic venous disease. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2011;155:367-71.

15. Mahapatra S, Ramakrishna P, Gupta B, et al. Correlation of obesity & comorbid conditions with chronic venous insufficiency: results of a single-centre study. Indian J Med Res 2018;147:471-6.

16. Padberg F Jr, Cerveira JJ, Lal BK, et al. Does severe venous insufficiency have a different etiology in the morbidly obese? Is it venous? J Vasc Surg 2003;37:79-85.

17. Chen T, Liu P, Zhang C, et al. Pathophysiology and genetic associations of varicose veins: a narrative review. Angiology 2025;76:615-28.

18. Yeldan I, Gurdal Karakelle S, Tosun Aydın G, et al. The relationship between clinical severity and outcome measures in patients with chronic venous insufficiency with or without leg ulcer. J Tissue Viability 2021;30:310-6.

19. Navarro TP, Delis KT, Ribeiro AP. Clinical and hemodynamic significance of the greater saphenous vein diameter in chronic venous insufficiency. Arch Surg 2002;137:1233-7.

20. Panpikoon T, Metheekul P, Treesit T, et al. Diameter-reflux relationship of the saphenous vein in the C0-C3 patients of chronic venous disease. Phlebology 2022;37:439-44.

21. Naleini F, Hassani M, Bagherhosseini N, Sobhiyeh M. Ultrasonographic measurement of saphenous vein diameter compared to CEAP classification in patients with varicose veins. J Vasc Nurs 2022;40:43-6.

22. Choi JY, Lee JH, Kwon OJ. Association between the saphenous vein diameter and venous reflux on computed tomography venography in patients with varicose veins. PLoS One 2022;17:e0263513.

23. Radhakrishnan N, George D, Jayakrishnan R, et al. Vein size and disease severity in chronic venous diseases. Int J Angiol 2018;27:185-9.

24. Silva WT, Ávila MR, et al. Differences in health-related quality of life in patients with mild and severe chronic venous insufficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Nurs 2021;39:126-33.

25. Launois R. Health-related quality-of-life scales specific for chronic venous disorders of the lower limbs. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2015;3:219-27.

26. Harfouche JN. Keys to enhance patients’adherence to compression therapy. Veins and Lymphatics 2018;7:7633.

27. Behairy AS, Masry SE. Impact of educational nursing intervention on compression therapy adherence and recurrence of venous leg ulcers: a quasi-experimental study. Ocul Oncol Pathol 2022;8:120-32.

28. Žulec M, Rotar Pavlič D, Žulec A. The effect of an educational intervention on self-care in patients with venous leg ulcers-a randomized controlled trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19:4657.

29. Uhl JF, Benigni JP, Chahim M, Fréderic D. Prospective randomized controlled study of patient compliance in using a compression stocking: importance of recommendations of the practitioner as a factor for better compliance. Phlebology 2018;33:36-43.

30. Gianesini S, Zimmet S, Bottini O, et al. Increasing public venous awareness, graduated compression stockings compliance and scientific data collection through open events on golf courses: A feasibility study. Veins and Lymphatics 2018;7:7631.

How to Cite



Primary care-based assessment of chronic venous insufficiency: a cross-sectional analytical study. (2026). Veins and Lymphatics, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/vl.2026.14891