NEW FOOD FRAUDS IN SEAFOOD CHAIN: TUB GURNARD OR PANGASIUS?


Submitted: 3 January 2013
Accepted: 3 January 2013
Published: 1 April 2011
Abstract Views: 967
PDF: 1269
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • M. C. Campagna Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Regioni Lazio e Toscana – Roma, Italy.
  • S. Marozzi Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Regioni Lazio e Toscana – Roma, Italy.
  • R. Condoleo Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Regioni Lazio e Toscana – Roma, Italy.
  • N. Bottalico Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Regioni Lazio e Toscana – Roma, Italy.
  • A. Nardoni Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Regioni Lazio e Toscana – Roma, Italy.
  • R. Cavallina Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Regioni Lazio e Toscana – Roma, Italy.
The present study reports a case of food fraud occurred in the Lazio region. Using the Isoelectrofocusing we revealed the substitution of tub-gurnard, with the less valuable commercial fish, pangasius.

1.
Campagna MC, Marozzi S, Condoleo R, Bottalico N, Nardoni A, Cavallina R. NEW FOOD FRAUDS IN SEAFOOD CHAIN: TUB GURNARD OR PANGASIUS?. Ital J Food Safety [Internet]. 2011 Apr. 1 [cited 2024 Apr. 19];1(1):95-6. Available from: https://www.pagepressjournals.org/ijfs/article/view/ijfs.2011.1.95

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations