Attitudes and beliefs of emergency physicians on lab tests utilization in clinical practice. A multicenter survey

  • Carlotta Saccenti Emergency Department, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
  • Marco Lunian Emergency Department, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
  • Martina Montagnana Section of Clinical Chemistry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Andrea Balloni Emergency Department, ASUR Marche Hospital of Fermo, Fermo, Italy.
  • Giulia Maria Azin Emergency Department, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
  • Roberto Lerza Emergency Department, S. Paolo Hospital, Savona, Italy.
  • Michele Mitaritonno Emergency Department, Hospital of Cosenza, Cosenza, Italy.
  • Matteo Pistorello Emergency Department, Hospital of Treviso, Treviso, Italy.
  • Michele Santoro Emergency Department, “Cardinal Giovanni Panico” Hospital, Tricase, Lecce, Italy.
  • Roberto Fiorini Emergency Department, Hospital of Vaio-Fidenza, Fidenza, Italy.
  • Laura Bonfanti | labonfanti@ao.pr.it Emergency Department, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.

Abstract

It is commonly perceived that the main obstacle for an effective partnership between Emergency Medicine (EM) and Laboratory Medicine (LM) is the lack of reciprocal knowledge and understanding. A further aspect is a partial comprehension of clinical significance and implications of some tests. The real scenario of attitudes and beliefs of Emergency Physicians (EPs) on lab tests utilization in clinical practice remains largely unclear. Therefore, this original study was designed to explore this field of medical knowledge, by using a survey on attitudes and beliefs in laboratory diagnostics which was disseminated among many Italian EPs. A questionnaire containing 20 different items/statements was designed and then disseminated either directly, or in a digital format. Overall, 183 questionnaires were compiled and collected. The results of this nationwide survey seem to confirm the existence of a suboptimal knowledge of both clinical and economic impact of urgent laboratory tests by Italian EPs. An unsatisfactory relationship between EPs and laboratory professionals seems also to emerge. Several EPs attribute this to Shortage of time to think (18.6%), followed by Fair of medical-legal litigation (13.6%). On the other hand, interestingly, it also emerged that some Italian hospitals still include obsolete o redundant tests in panels of urgent laboratory analyses, potentially misleading for the diagnostic reasoning in the Emergency Department (ED). In conclusion, the virtuous circle between EM and LM should be further reinforced for optimizing clinical pathways in Italian EDs, improving clinical outcomes and reducing unnecessary expenditures. A major agreement between laboratory and emergency professionals

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2019-10-08
Info
Issue
Section
Original Articles
Keywords:
Emergency medicine, Laboratory tests, Clinical biochemistry, Diagnostic process, Diagnostic strategies, Emergency Department
Statistics
  • Abstract views: 366

  • PDF: 219
  • APPENDIX: 68
How to Cite
Saccenti, C., Lunian, M., Montagnana, M., Balloni, A., Azin, G., Lerza, R., Mitaritonno, M., Pistorello, M., Santoro, M., Fiorini, R., & Bonfanti, L. (2019). Attitudes and beliefs of emergency physicians on lab tests utilization in clinical practice. A multicenter survey. Emergency Care Journal, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/ecj.2019.8237

Most read articles by the same author(s)