Evaluation of the complications in laparoscopic retroperitoneal radical nephrectomy; An experience of high volume centre


Submitted: July 19, 2017
Accepted: August 3, 2017
Published: December 31, 2017
Abstract Views: 1287
PDF: 543
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • Ali Serdar Gozen Department of Urology, SLK-Kliniken, University of Heidelberg, Heilbronn, Germany, Germany.
  • Vitalie Gherman Department of Urology, SLK-Kliniken, University of Heidelberg, Heilbronn, Germany; Department of Urology, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, Germany.
  • Yigit Akin Department of Urology, SLK-Kliniken, University of Heidelberg, Heilbronn, Germany, .
  • Mustafa Suat Bolat SLK-Kliniken, University of Heidelberg, Heilbronn, Germany, Germany.
  • Muhammad Elmussareh Department of Urology, Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust , Wakefield , UK., United Kingdom.
  • Jens Rassweiler Department of Urology, SLK-Kliniken, University of Heidelberg, Heilbronn, Germany, Germany.
Objectives: To provide a standardised report of complications after retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (rLRN) in a high-volume centre using Clavien-Dindo classification. Materials and methods: We analysed records maintained in a prospective database of 330 consecutive patients that underwent rLRN between March 1995 and September 2016. All complications were graded according to the modified Clavien-Dindo classification. Three generations of surgeons were defined and the learning curve in rLRN was evaluated by comparing the first 100 cases (Group A) performed by firstgeneration surgeons with the last 100 cases (Group B) by thirdgeneration surgeons. Results: The mean age of our cohort was 66 ± 11.9 years. The overall complication rate was 19.7%. The majority of complications (12.7%) were Clavien 1 (5.1%) and Clavien 2 (7.6%) and did not require any interventions; blood transfusion was the most frequently encountered intervention (4.8%). Half of which were because of major intraoperative bleeding. Mortality rate was 0.9%. We found a trend towards lower complication rate in group B (19%) compared to group A (23%); this was mainly because of the reduction in the incidence of Clavien 1 and 2 complications. The pathological stage varied significantly in the two groups while the rate of negative surgical margins was comparable. Conclusions: rLRN is a safe procedure with an acceptable rate of complications. The learning curve was shorter for the thirdgeneration surgeons (group B); although these surgeons operated on a significantly higher number of patients with more advanced diseases. The Clavien-Dindo classification is suitable for assessing rLRN complications. Adopting this standardised system can help in the evaluation and comparison of surgical quality of LRN series.

Gozen, A. S., Gherman, V., Akin, Y., Bolat, M. S., Elmussareh, M., & Rassweiler, J. (2017). Evaluation of the complications in laparoscopic retroperitoneal radical nephrectomy; An experience of high volume centre. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 89(4), 266–271. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2017.4.266

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations