Metabolic evaluation in patients with infected nephrolithiasis: Is it necessary?


Submitted: May 21, 2016
Accepted: October 5, 2016
Published: October 5, 2016
Abstract Views: 1792
PDF: 1280
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Fifty-four patients with infected renal lithiasis underwent complete metabolic evaluation searching for underlying factors contributing to stone formation including urine analysis and culture. Metabolic abnormalities were significantly more present in patients with mixed infected stones (struvite+/-apatite and calcium oxalate) than in patients with pure infected stones (struvite+/-carbonate apatite): hypercalciuria in 40%, hyperoxaluria in 34% and hyperuricosuria in 28% (p < 0.05). Urinary excretion of citrate was low in both groups without statistically significant difference (238+/-117 mg/24 h vs 214+/-104 mg/24/h, t = 0.72, p = 0.5). The few metabolic abnormalities present in patients with pure infected stones should suggest that urinary tract infection could change the urine chemistry in a lithogenic direction and be only cause of stone formation.

Cicerello, E., Mangano, M., Cova, G. D., Merlo, F., & Maccatrozzo, L. (2016). Metabolic evaluation in patients with infected nephrolithiasis: Is it necessary?. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 88(3), 208–211. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2016.3.208

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations