Penile fracture: Retrospective analysis of our case history with long-term assessment of the erectile and sexological outcome

  • Nicola Pavan | nicpavan@gmail.com Urology Department, Cattinara Hospital, University of Trieste, Italy.
  • Giorgia Tezzot Urology Department, Cattinara Hospital, University of Trieste, Italy.
  • Giovanni Liguori Urology Department, Cattinara Hospital, University of Trieste, Italy.
  • Renata Napoli Urology Department, Cattinara Hospital, University of Trieste, Italy.
  • Paolo Umari Urology Department, Cattinara Hospital, University of Trieste, Italy.
  • Michele Rizzo Urology Department, Cattinara Hospital, University of Trieste, Italy.
  • Giovanni Chiriacò Urology Department, Cattinara Hospital, University of Trieste, Italy.
  • Gaetano Chiapparrone Urology Department, Cattinara Hospital, University of Trieste, Italy.
  • Francesca Vedovo Urology Department, Cattinara Hospital, University of Trieste, Italy.
  • Michele Bertolotto Radiology Department, Cattinara Hospital, University of Trieste, Italy.
  • Carlo Trombetta Urology Department, Cattinara Hospital, University of Trieste, Italy.

Abstract

Objectives: To review the cases of patients with suspected penile fracture and asses erectile and sexological outcomes. Materials and methods: from 1987 to 2013 presented to the Urology Clinic of Trieste and at the AIED of Pordenone a total of 41 cases that were divided into two groups according to the timing of treatment: 18 patients with anamnestic diagnosis of penile fracture treated nonimmediately and 23 patients treated immediately after the trauma. For all patients we evaluated the type of treatment adopted, the occurrence of complications and reoperations and the follow-up. The erectile function was also evaluated through the IIEF, as well as the psychological impact of the trauma on social and sex life, using a psycho- sexological questionnaire. Results: Among patients treated immediately after the trauma 14 were subjected to surgery. About a year after surgery, penile curvature was reported in 1 patient, pain in 3 patients, urinary disorders in 1 patient, while none reported erectile dysfunction (ED). Out of these, only 3 patients underwent reoperation. Among those treated conservatively 1 patient reported curvature, 1 patient reported pain and none reported ED. Among patients who were admitted at a later date, 14 reported curvature and 4 reported pain whereas urinary disorders were reported in 1 and ED in 4 patients. From a psychological point of view, the trauma caused in most cases a fear of new trauma and of repercussions on erectile function and sensitivity. Conclusions: The diagnosis is mainly clinical; however, radiological investigation is essential to confirm the diagnosis, assess the site and extent of the trauma and possible urethral involvement, so as to plan the most appropriate treatment. In addition, immediate treatment leads to better long-term results, with a lower incidence of ED and penile curvature. Psychologically, penile trauma intensifies the fear of reoccurrence; it decreases, however, with the passage of time.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2014-12-30
Info
Issue
Section
Original Papers - Andrology
Keywords:
Penile fracture, Outcomes, Penile surgery, Penile ultrasound, Erectile deficiency
Statistics
  • Abstract views: 1939

  • PDF: 915
How to Cite
Pavan, N., Tezzot, G., Liguori, G., Napoli, R., Umari, P., Rizzo, M., Chiriacò, G., Chiapparrone, G., Vedovo, F., Bertolotto, M., & Trombetta, C. (2014). Penile fracture: Retrospective analysis of our case history with long-term assessment of the erectile and sexological outcome. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 86(4), 359-370. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2014.4.359