Original Articles
Vol. 2 No. 1 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.4081/hls.2014.1839
Did capitation payment reform make a difference in Chinese rural primary health care?
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 25 July 2013
Accepted: 25 September 2013
Published: 24 February 2014
Accepted: 25 September 2013
Published: 24 February 2014
1770
Views
1690
Downloads
430
HTML
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Supporting Agencies
the paper was supported by a World Health Organization grant, 11.001.WP01. CHN01, 11.5How to Cite
Did capitation payment reform make a difference in Chinese rural primary health care?. (2014). Healthcare in Low-Resource Settings, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/hls.2014.1839