Reflections on the Canadian study by Traboulsee et al. Prevalence of extracranial venous narrowing on catheter venography in people with multiple sclerosis, their siblings, and unrelated healthy controls: a blinded, case-control study


Submitted: 15 February 2015
Accepted: 16 March 2015
Published: 27 March 2015
Abstract Views: 1048
HTML: 3570
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Preface by P. Zamboni

The Editorial How to objectively assess primary venous obstruction published in the last 2014 issue of Veins and Lymphatics (http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/vl.2014.4195) stimulates an intense scientific debate even involving the social networks. Strictly correlated to such an open scientific discussion we herein receive a Letter condensing thoughts again about the Traboulsee et al.’s paper published on the Lancet.


Mandolesi, S., d’Alessandro, A., Niglio, T., & Rossi, M. (2015). Reflections on the Canadian study by Traboulsee et al. Prevalence of extracranial venous narrowing on catheter venography in people with multiple sclerosis, their siblings, and unrelated healthy controls: a blinded, case-control study. Veins and Lymphatics, 4(1). Retrieved from https://www.pagepressjournals.org/vl/article/view/vl.2015.5100

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations