Journal of Entomological and Acarological Research https://www.pagepressjournals.org/jear <p>The <strong>Journal of Entomological and Acarological Research</strong> (JEAR), formerly the Bollettino di Zoologia Agraria e di Bachicoltura of the Institute of Entomology of the Università degli Studi, Milano, was founded in 1928 by Remo Grandori. Thereafter, Minos Martelli and Luciano Süss held the direction of the Journal until December 2011. In January 2012, the Editor decided for the new open-access on-line version of JEAR.</p> <p>The Journal publishes original research papers on Arthropods; reviews, editorials, technical reports, brief notes, conference proceedings, letters to the Editor, and book reviews are also welcome.</p> <p>JEAR has four main areas of interest:</p> <ul> <li class="show"><strong>Entomology</strong> (systematics; morphology; biology; biotechnology; agriculture, ornamental and forest entomology; applied entomology; integrated pest management; biological control; apiculture and apidology; medical, urban and veterinary entomology; etc.)</li> <li class="show"><strong>Stored product pests</strong> (biology; integrated pest management; etc.)</li> <li class="show"><strong>Insect Ecology</strong> (behaviour; biodiversity; taxonomy; plant insect interaction and ecosystems; biological control; alien species; etc.)</li> <li class="show"><strong>Acarology</strong> (systematics; morphology; biology; parasitology; control; etc.)</li> </ul> <p>The publication of manuscripts is subject to the approval of the Section Editor who has knowledge of the field discussed in the manuscript in accordance with the principles of peer review; referees will be selected from the Editorial Board or among qualified scientists of the international scientific community. Articles must be written in English and adhere to the guidelines and details contained in the Instructions to Authors.</p> <p> </p> en-US <p><strong>PAGEPress</strong> has chosen to apply the <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License</strong></a> (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.</p> alice.fiorani@pagepress.org (Alice Fiorani) tiziano.taccini@pagepress.org (Tiziano Taccini) Mon, 11 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0000 OJS 3.3.0.13 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 <em>Chrysis fuscipennis</em> or <em>Chrysis angolensis</em>? An answer with new synonymies, a new combination and species resurrected (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae) https://www.pagepressjournals.org/jear/article/view/12417 <p>All species of the <em>Chrysis angolensis</em> group were synonymised with <em>C. angolensis</em> Radoszkovsky, 1881, excluding <em>Chrysis diademata</em> Mocsáry, 1889, endemic of the Philippines. However, after the study of type materials, four species are herein resurrected: <em>Chrysis callaina</em> Gribodo, 1884 stat. reviv., <em>C. erratica</em> Abeille de Perrin and du Buysson in du Buysson, 1887 stat. reviv., <em>C. mossulensis</em> Abeille de Perrin and du Buysson in du Buysson, 1887 stat. reviv., <em>C. sulcifera</em> Bischoff, 1910 stat. reviv. New synonymies are proposed for the following taxa: <em>C. szalayana</em> Mocsáry, 1912 n. syn. and <em>C. ukerewensis</em> Mocsáry, 1914, n. syn. of <em>C. callaina</em> Gribodo, 1884; <em>Chrysis janthina</em> Smith, 1874 n. syn. of <em>C. brachyceras</em> Bischoff, 1910. The new combination <em>Praestochrysis brachyceras</em> (Bischoff, 1910) n. comb. is proposed. <em>Chrysis fuscipennis</em> Brullé, 1846, the name in use for the oldest taxon described in the angolensis group, was replaced with <em>Chrysis angolensis</em> Radoszkovsky, 1881 because primary junior homonym of <em>C. fuscipennis</em> Dahlbom, 1829. However, <em>Chrysis angolensis</em> is here regarded as nomen dubium, <em>C. fuscipennis</em> Dahlbom, 1829 as nomen oblitum, because no longer in use as a valid name after 1899, and <em>C. fuscipennis</em> Brullé as nomen protectum, thus making the name <em>C. fuscipennis</em> Brullé, 1846 stat. reviv. available and restored.</p> Paolo Rosa Copyright (c) 2024 Paolo Rosa http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 https://www.pagepressjournals.org/jear/article/view/12417 Mon, 11 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0000 Comparison of different trapping devices for the capture of <em>Bactrocera oleae</em> (Rossi) and other non-target insects in the Mediterranean basin https://www.pagepressjournals.org/jear/article/view/12302 <p>The present study aimed to compare some commercial traps baited with ammonium carbonate for their efficacy in monitoring <em>Bactrocera oleae</em> (Rossi) and their selectivity toward beneficial insects, under the conditions of olive groves located in five Mediterranean countries (Greece, Italy, Lebanon, Spain, Tunisia). The selectivity of the devices was evaluated toward several groups of non-target insects, namely lacewings (Chrysopidae), hoverflies (Syrphidae), ladybirds (Coccinellidae), bees (Apoidea) and hymenopteran parasitoids. The following devices were compared: yellow sticky panel, green sticky panel, Jackson trap with different combinations of yellow and white colours of the device and/or the panel, and McPhail trap. In most cases, the McPhail trap and the yellow panel showed the highest efficacy in monitoring male and female <em>B. oleae</em> flies; however, the yellow panel was most attractive for some groups of non-target insects, particularly the hymenopteran parasitoids, whereas the comparative non-target effects were sitespecific for the other arthropod groups. In the case of Chrysopidae, McPhail caught more individuals than the other traps in Italy and Spain, whereas in Lebanon and Greece, the highest number of individuals was captured in the two sticky panels. Coccinellidae were found in very low numbers only in Lebanon on yellow panels. Syrphidae were captured mainly on sticky panels in Greece and Tunisia. Apoidea were found only on yellow panels in Lebanon. The choice between the McPhail trap and the yellow panel should be made on the basis of various evaluations carried out at the site, including operational ones.</p> Andrea Sciarretta, Tania Travaglini, Linda Kfoury, Ines Ksentini, Meelad Yousef-Yousef, Marios-Ioannis Sotiras, Ahmad El Bitar, Mohieddine Ksantini, Enrique Quesada-Moraga, Dionysios Perdikis Copyright (c) 2024 Andrea Sciarretta, Tania Travaglini, Linda Kfoury, Ines Ksentini, Meelad Yousef-Yousef, Marios-Ioannis Sotiras, Ahmad El Bitar, Mohieddine Ksantini, Enrique Quesada-Moraga, Dionysios Perdikis http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 https://www.pagepressjournals.org/jear/article/view/12302 Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0000 Exploring biocidal effects of methyl salicylate and limonene toward <em>Trogoderma granarium</em> Everts https://www.pagepressjournals.org/jear/article/view/12271 <p>The khapra beetle, <em>Trogoderma granarium</em>, poses a significant threat as a post-harvest pest in stored products and stands out as a crucial quarantine concern globally. Unlike many other stored product pests, this species proved challenging to manage using conventional insecticides and alternative non-chemical methods. The exploration of plant-based natural products, particularly essential oils, as alternatives arises in response to challenges associated with the prolonged use of synthetic insecticides. While essential oils show promising activity, their use encounters challenges associated with standardization. This study investigates the feasibility of employing some single chemical compounds widespread in several essential oils with insecticidal activity as candidate insecticides, specifically limonene and methyl salicylate in contact/fumigation bioassays toward <em>T. granarium</em> adults. The results showed that methyl salicylate caused a lethal time of 50% (LT50) at the dose of 1 mg after 7.40 hours of exposure. The LT50 calculated for limonene was 86.83 hours while positive control using deltamethrin, used at the recommended dose of the manufacturer, was 5.20 hours after exposure. These data suggest that methyl salicylate can be exploited as a candidate for further tests in field conditions toward <em>T. granarium</em> also in consideration of its relative low toxicity for humans.</p> Mokhtar Abdulsattar Arif, Salvatore Guarino Copyright (c) 2024 Mokhtar Abdulsattar Arif, Salvatore Guarino http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 https://www.pagepressjournals.org/jear/article/view/12271 Mon, 29 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0000 First report of Coccinellid beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) from Gharana Wetland Conservation Reserve and connected agricultural fields in Jammu https://www.pagepressjournals.org/jear/article/view/12255 <p>The present study reveals that Predatory ladybird beetles are being utilized for the application of biological control in many agricultural and horticultural fields globally. A comprehensive survey was carried out for the collection of ladybird beetles by different methods like handpicking, sweeping net, and beat tray method in the month of May and June 2023 in Gharana wetland conservation reserve and connected agricultural fields along the international border in the outskirts of Jammu. A total number of 12 species were collected. The collected specimens were identified up to the species level as <em>Coccinella septumpunctata</em> (Linnaeus), <em>Hippodamia variegata</em> (Goeze), <em>Propylea dissecta</em> (Mulsant), <em>Henosepilachna vigintioctopunctata</em> (Fabricius), <em>Menochilus sexmaculatus</em> (Fabricius), <em>Brumoides suturalis</em> (Fabricius), <em>Oenopia sauzeti</em> (Mulsant), <em>Anegleis cardoni</em> (Weise), <em>Oenopia conglobata</em> (Mulsant), <em>Micraspis allardi</em> (Mulsant), <em>Platynaspidius saundersi</em> (crotch), <em>Harmonia eucharis</em> (Mulsant). This study also shows the dominance of the two species <em>i.e.</em>, <em>Coccinella septumpunctata</em> and <em>Oenopia sauzeti</em> occurring along the agricultural fields in the vicinity of this wetland.</p> Anosh Ali, Mohd Yousuf, Akhtar Ali Khan Copyright (c) 2024 Anosh Ali, Mohd Yousuf, Akhtar Ali Khan http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 https://www.pagepressjournals.org/jear/article/view/12255 Mon, 29 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0000