Patient’s satisfaction after 2-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: An Italian multicentric study


Submitted: February 7, 2016
Accepted: February 11, 2016
Published: March 31, 2016
Abstract Views: 2678
PDF: 1613
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • Giorgio Gentile Andrology-Unit, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna; Department of Urology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
  • Alessandro Franceschelli Andrology-Unit, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
  • Paolo Massenio Department of Urology and kidney transplant Center, University of Foggia, Iraq.
  • Agostino Tuccio Department of Urology and Oncology, AOU Careggi, University of Florence, Italy.
  • Andrea Cocci Department of Urology and Oncology, AOU Careggi, University of Florence, Iran, Islamic Republic of.
  • Lucia Divenuto Department of Urology, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Ireland.
  • Daniele Romagnoli Department of Urology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
  • Alessandro Natali Department of Urology and Oncology, AOU Careggi, University of Florence, Italy.
  • Antonio Vitarelli Department of Urology, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Italy.
  • Luigi Cormio Department of Urology and kidney transplant Center, University of Foggia, Italy.
  • Fulvio Colombo Andrology-Unit, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
Introduction: Penile prosthesis implant represents a valuable solution for pts with severe erectile dysfunction (ED), non-responders to medical management. The aim of our study was to evaluate the satisfaction of patients (pts) after 2-pieces inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP). Aim of the study: to evaluate safety, reliability and post-operative patient’s satisfaction after implantation of two-pieces IPP. Materials and Methods: This retrospective multicentric analysis concerns a group of 42 patients undergone 2-pieces IPP implantation from November 2005 to November 2013, in four Centers of proven experience. As a first step, a detailed review of all clinical reports was performed. Secondly, every patient was asked to fill the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) specifically modified, in order to assess their own satisfaction after surgery and, its impact on patient’s quality of sexual life. Results: 42 pts were evaluated (AMS-Ambicor: 28; Coloplast- Excell: 14); mean age, at time of operation: 60,7 years; mean follow up: 27,6 months; etiology of ED: vascular 23,8%, diabetes 19%, La Peyronie D. 7,1%, consequence of radical prostatectomy 31%, consequence of other pelvic surgery 11,9%, spinal trauma 7%. Mean operative time: 117 ± 58 min, mean postoperative hospital stay 3 ± 1,6 days. Post operative short-term complications: 4 pts (9,5%). Post operative long-term complications: 4 pts (9,5%). Long-term functional results (Questionnaire): 71% of pts (30) reported regular use of the prosthesis, at least 1 time/week, the satisfaction was good in 42% of pts (18), quite good in 33,3% (14), quite bad in 2,4% (1), very bad in 7,1% (3), 6 pts (14,4%) didn’t answer. Conclusions: 2 pieces IPP appears to be associated with a low complication rate and good satisfaction of pts especially in the elderly. It also assures satisfactory rates of aesthetics and functional results.

Gentile, G., Franceschelli, A., Massenio, P., Tuccio, A., Cocci, A., Divenuto, L., Romagnoli, D., Natali, A., Vitarelli, A., Cormio, L., & Colombo, F. (2016). Patient’s satisfaction after 2-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: An Italian multicentric study. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 88(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2016.1.1

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations