Clinical presentation of urolithiasis in older and younger population


Submitted: January 23, 2015
Accepted: January 23, 2015
Published: December 30, 2014
Abstract Views: 2612
PDF: 1059
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • Murat Dursun Bahcelievler State Hospital, Department of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Emin Ozbek Katip Celebi University, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Urology, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Alper Otunctemur Okmeydani Training and Research Hospital, Department of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Suleyman Sahin Bilecik State Hospital, Department of Urology, Bilecik, Turkey.
  • Suleyman Sami Cakir Bayburt State Hospital, Department of Urology, Bayburt, Turkey.
Aim of the study: We compared stone size, localization, complaint at the time of applying, comorbidity, treatment and complications between older (60 years of age and older) and younger patients with urolithiasis (59 years of age and younger). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 950 consecutive patients who presented to our clinic and underwent surgery for urolithiasis from January 2007 to March 2012. The patients were divided into two groups: patients ≥ 60 years an patients < 60 years. Results: There were 174 men and 61 women in elderly group, 528 men and 187 women in younger group. Ureteral stones were found more often in the younger group compared to elderly patients (p < 0.05). Conversely, bladder stone was more frequent in the elderly group. In the elderly group comorbidities are more frequent (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, congestive heart disease, osteoarthritis and chronic obstructive lung). Patients ≥ 60 years significantly had larger kidney and bladder stones compared the younger, but ureteral stone sizes were not statistically different between the two groups. Older patients had a higher postoperative complication rate than younger patients (16% versus 3%, p < 0.05) although postoperative complications (e.g. urinary retention, cardiac dysrythmia, fever, constipation) were not serious and resolved with medical treatment. The average length of stay in hospital was longer in the elderly group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Elderly patients with urolithiasis usually have larger and more complex stone disease, more comorbidities and atypical presentation.

Dursun, M., Ozbek, E., Otunctemur, A., Sahin, S., & Cakir, S. S. (2014). Clinical presentation of urolithiasis in older and younger population. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 86(4), 249–252. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2014.4.249

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations